<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>C++Next</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cpp-next.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cpp-next.com</link>
	<description>The next generation of C++</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 01:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BoostCon / C++Now!&#160;2012</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2012/03/boostcon-cnow-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2012/03/boostcon-cnow-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=4017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may have heard, the 2012 edition of BoostCon has been re-branded as C++Now! Well, the keynote speakers have been announced and the program has been set. This year is looking like a blockbuster! See you there…]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2012/03/boostcon-cnow-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Breakthrough for&#160;Concepts</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/12/a-breakthrough-for-concepts/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/12/a-breakthrough-for-concepts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=4003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This entry is part of a series, Having It All&#187; In the last article in this series, I mentioned that we&#8217;ve solved the problem with polymorphic lambdas and concepts, and I promised to discuss it here. So here we go! Quick concepts review Just like type declarations, concepts would add two kinds of type-checking to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/12/a-breakthrough-for-concepts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Having it all: Pythy syntax for&#160;C++</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/11/having-it-all-pythy-syntax/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/11/having-it-all-pythy-syntax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 08:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=3972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This entry is part of a series, Having It All&#187; As I&#8217;ve been dreaming about the future of C++, I&#8217;ve started to ask myself, &#8220;what if we could have it all?&#8221; What if we could write C++ code with the agility of Python programmers, and still have all the static checking we really want, when [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/11/having-it-all-pythy-syntax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BoostCon 2011: Early Registration Deadline&#160;Approaching</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/04/boostcon-2011-registration-deadline-approaching/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/04/boostcon-2011-registration-deadline-approaching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=3817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The premier annual US C++ event, BoostCon, runs May 15-20, 2011 in beautiful Aspen, Colorado! Hans Boehm, the father of C++ garbage collection and the C++0x threading model, headlines the fifth annual Boost Conference, with his keynote, &#8220;Threads and Shared Variables in C++0x.&#8221; Other sessions about which which I&#8217;m personally excited: Christopher Kohlhoff, the author [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/04/boostcon-2011-registration-deadline-approaching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appearing and Disappearing consts in&#160;C++</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/04/appearing-and-disappearing-consts-in-c/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/04/appearing-and-disappearing-consts-in-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Meyers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=3652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[C++Next is happy to republish the following article by Scott Meyers, with Scott&#8217;s permission, of course. Thanks, Scott! If you write “int i;” in C++, i’s type seems obvious: int. If you write “const int i;”, i’s type seems equally obviously to be const int. Often, these types are exactly what they seem to be, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/04/appearing-and-disappearing-consts-in-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended&#160;Reading</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/03/recommended-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/03/recommended-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=3649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s some very nice empirical work on evaluating the costs and benefits of using C++ exception-handling in this post.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/03/recommended-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>W00t W00t Nix&#160;Nix!</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/02/w00t-w00t-nix-nix/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/02/w00t-w00t-nix-nix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value Semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wg21]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=3419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Michal Mocny published an article applauding the C++ Committee&#8217;s recent decision to keep implicitly-generated move operations in the C++0x standard. I disagree, and I think it raises some really interesting questions about the standardization process and what&#8217;s next for C++, which I&#8217;ll discuss at the end. For those of you who missed my previous [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/02/w00t-w00t-nix-nix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expressive C++: Expression&#160;Optimization</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/01/expressive-c-expression-optimization/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/01/expressive-c-expression-optimization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Niebler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=3628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This entry is part of a series, Expressive C++&#187; Welcome back to Expressive C++, a series of articles about Embedded Domain-Specific Languages and Boost.Proto, a library for implementing them in C++. In previous articles, we discussed EDSLs as a way to provide expressive and powerful library interfaces. Well and good, but some might dismiss the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/01/expressive-c-expression-optimization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give a Talk at BoostCon&#160;2011</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/01/give-a-talk-at-boostcon-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/01/give-a-talk-at-boostcon-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Abrahams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=3445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy new year, everybody! First, I want to thank you all for making 2010 such a great year for this site. The discussions and ideas have been excellent, and we&#8217;re looking forward to an even better 2011. But first, a quick plea to all our readers: this year&#8217;s BoostCon, scheduled for May 15-20 in beautiful [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2011/01/give-a-talk-at-boostcon-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Elements of Programming&quot; Chapter 5: Ordered Algebraic&#160;Structures</title>
		<link>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2010/12/elements-of-programming-chapter-5-ordered-algebraic-structures/</link>
		<comments>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2010/12/elements-of-programming-chapter-5-ordered-algebraic-structures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terje Slettebø</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter Summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EoP Study Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpp-next.com/?p=3339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This entry is part of a series, Elements of Programming&#187; This chapter provides a taxonomy for a number of concepts from abstract algebra, and then proceeds to implement functions that relies only on the minimum requirements to implement them (similar to how STL algorithms are defined in terms of the minimum requirements on types, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cpp-next.com/archive/2010/12/elements-of-programming-chapter-5-ordered-algebraic-structures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

